Concept image of the metallic structure inside an aircraft fuselage.

Agents draft.Tools check.Engineers decide.

SAFETY AI Agentic EcoSystem

A shared workspace for safety engineers, specialised AI agents and engineering tools. Designed to connect expertise, evidence and human judgement.

Explore the workflow

Concept in development · Synthetic demonstration

More capacity. Shared expertise. Human responsibility.

ENCORDA explores how teams can take on more work while preserving the rigour that safety engineering demands.

Starting with equipment RAMS
Concept image of two engineers reviewing a wiring harness in an aircraft laboratory.
Human expertise at the centre of the workflow. AI-generated concept imagery

Make experience reusable

Turn approved methods and senior expertise into guided workflows that support experienced engineers and new colleagues alike.

Connect teams

Bring people, evidence and working methods together across teams and languages, with access appropriate to each project.

Build with the people who use it

Involve engineers early. Let their feedback shape the workspace, the agent roles and the way results are reviewed.

A change. A question. A human decision.

An illustrative aircraft wiring change shows how the workspace could support an engineer. Equipment RAMS — Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety — is the first reference area.

Wiring change · Example EC-014Fictional equipment and data
Concept rendering of aircraft structural ribs, cable bundles and an avionics module.
Proposed route

AI-generated concept imagery

01 / 03

Engineer + planning agent

A device moves. Its wiring follows.

The engineer supplies a marked routing change and structured connection data. The agent prepares a list of affected analyses, sources and open questions.

Proposed route
02 / 03

Analysis agent + engineering evidence

An assumption needs another look.

Two signal paths now share an attachment area. The agent flags the existing independence assumption and links the relevant evidence. Whether a single damage event could affect both paths remains a question for specialists.

Shared area
03 / 03

Engineer + specialist review

The decision stays with the engineer.

The engineer requests an alternative route and records the reason. Agents prepare the resulting documentation changes for review. Acceptance and release remain with the authorised people.

Alternative route

Illustrative interaction only. No live agents, geometry analysis, calculations or actual approvals are performed.

Responsibility is part of the design.

The ambition extends from a useful prototype to a controlled production environment. The required evidence and approvals must be established as the project develops.

PeopleAI agentsTools

Human authority

Engineers own safety judgements and approvals. An agent proposal is clearly identified as a proposal.

Evidence in context

Link drafts to sources, assumptions, versions and unresolved questions so reviewers can examine the reasoning.

Appropriate tools

Use engineering tools for calculations and checks, with recorded inputs and results. Language model output alone is not a calculation record.

A deliberate path to production

Develop prototypes and local-model variants without customer or classified data. Introduce such data only in an appropriately approved environment.

Value has to be demonstrated.

Compare equivalent work against a documented baseline. Count review, rework and operating costs, and distinguish AI effects from process improvements.

  • Human effortIncluding checking and rework
  • QualityAgainst agreed acceptance criteria
  • Elapsed timeIncluding handovers and waiting
  • Net valueRealised benefit after added costs

A concrete starting point. A broader ambition.

Today: a concept and an illustrative workflow. Operational benefits and production readiness remain to be demonstrated.